Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2009 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (7) TMI 170 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are the taxability of payments made by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOC) to a licensor for the use of a manufacturing process, specifically whether the payments constitute royalty under the Indo-Austrian treaty and are subject to tax in India.

Summary:
In this case, IOC entered into an agreement with a licensor for the use of the Biturox process in the manufacture of bitumen. The licensor provided a Basic Engineering Design Package (BEDP) to IOC, which included various technical details and designs for the plant. The taxability of payments related to the BEDP was disputed, with the tax authorities contending that the payments constituted royalty and were taxable in India.

The Dy. CIT directed IOC to deduct tax at 20% before making remittances to the licensor, based on the view that the payments were for the use of a process in India and therefore qualified as royalty under the treaty. However, the Tribunal considered the nature of the payments and relevant treaty provisions to determine the tax liability.

The Tribunal analyzed the agreement between IOC and the licensor, noting that the payments were for the supply of technical know-how and basic engineering documentation to create an asset in the form of a plant. The Tribunal referred to a previous ruling and concluded that the payments did not constitute royalty but were technical fees or business profits. As the services were not rendered in India and the licensor did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, the payments were not taxable in India.

Relying on precedents and treaty provisions, the Tribunal held that the payments made by IOC to the licensor were not in the nature of royalty and therefore not subject to tax in India. Consequently, IOC was not obligated to deduct tax at source, and the appeals by IOC were allowed.

This judgment clarifies the distinction between royalty payments and technical fees, emphasizing the importance of the nature of services rendered and the presence of a PE in determining tax liability under international treaties.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates