2002 (12) TMI 12 - SC - Income Tax

There is no dispute between the parties that the transactions of counter sales effected by the respondent involved customs clearance within the meaning of Explanation (aa) to section 80HHC(4A) and further that the sales were in convertible foreign exchange - In these circumstances, we are of the view that the Revenue having accepted and consistently followed the position of law settled by Ram Babu s case, particularly in the case of the assessee itself, there is no merit in this appeal

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deductions for export of goods. Application of Explanation (aa) to determine "export out of India." Disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80HHC based on counter sales involving customs clearance. Consistency in judicial decisions on the interpretation of Explanation (aa) across various High Courts and the Tribunal.

Analysis:
The judgment deals with an appeal against the Rajasthan High Court's decision under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, related to deductions under Section 80HHC for the export of goods. The Explanation (aa) of Section 80HHC excludes transactions involving sales in India without customs clearance from the definition of "export out of India." The assessee claimed a deduction under section 80HHC for the assessment year 1996-97, but it was disallowed by the Assessing Officer due to counter sales involving customs clearance. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the disallowance, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing the consistent judicial interpretation of Explanation (aa) by various High Courts, including the Allahabad High Court and the Rajasthan High Court.

The Tribunal noted that the Revenue had accepted and consistently followed the interpretation of Explanation (aa) as per the decision in Ram Babu's case by the Allahabad High Court. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting and following the settled consistent judicial view on the issue. It was highlighted that the transactions in question involved customs clearance and were conducted in convertible foreign exchange, meeting the criteria specified in Explanation (aa) of Section 80HHC(4A) of the Act.

Given the established judicial precedent and the Revenue's past acceptance of the interpretation of Explanation (aa), the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it without costs. The judgment underscores the significance of upholding consistency in judicial decisions and respecting settled legal interpretations across different High Courts and the Tribunal.