9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Nature of Cash Compensatory Support (CCS) as capital or revenue receipt. 2. Nature of Duty Drawback (DDB) as capital or revenue receipt. 3. Nature of income from sale of Import Entitlements (IE) as capital or revenue receipt. 4. Application of Section 10(17B) of the IT Act. 5. Correct head of income under which the receipts should be taxed. 6. Taxability of government grants under Article 266(3) of the Constitution of India. Summary: Issue 1: Nature of Cash Compensatory Support (CCS) The assessee argued that the 'Cash Compensatory Support' of Rs. 30,96,943.20 was a capital receipt and not taxable, contrary to the treatment by the IAC (Asstt.) and CIT (Appeals) as a 'revenue receipt'. The Tribunal admitted this additional ground, recognizing the need to examine whether such receipts could be taxed in law. Issue 2: Nature of Duty Drawback (DDB) Similarly, the assessee contended that 'Drawback of Duty' amounting to Rs. 23,02,930.73 was a capital receipt and not taxable. The Tribunal allowed this ground to be raised, acknowledging the necessity to determine the correct nature of such receipts under the law. Issue 3: Nature of Income from Sale of Import Entitlements (IE) The assessee claimed that the 'income from sale of Import Entitlement' of Rs. 4,56,517.70 was also a capital receipt and not taxable. This ground was admitted by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of correctly classifying such receipts. Issue 4: Application of Section 10(17B) of the IT Act The assessee argued that the assessing authority failed to apply the provisions of Sec. 10(17B) of the IT Act, which could exempt the amounts from being included in the total income. The Tribunal considered this ground, noting its relevance to the correct application of statutory provisions. Issue 5: Correct Head of Income The assessee submitted that the assessing authority erred in determining the head of income under which the receipts were taxed, specifically under 'Income from profits and gains' of business. The Tribunal admitted this ground, highlighting the need for accurate categorization of income heads. Issue 6: Taxability of Government Grants The assessee contended that the grants made by the Government for export promotion should not be taxable under the charging provisions of the IT Act, 1961, and that taxing such grants violated Article 266(3) of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal admitted this ground, recognizing the constitutional implications involved. Tribunal's Rationale and Conclusion: The Tribunal, after extensive deliberation and considering various judicial precedents, concluded that it has the inherent power to admit additional grounds of appeal under Section 254 of the IT Act, 1961, read with Rule 11 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. It emphasized that the power to admit new grounds is not a matter of jurisdiction but of judicial discretion, aimed at ensuring substantial justice. The Tribunal admitted all the additional grounds raised by the assessee, noting that they involved mixed questions of fact and law, went to the root of the assessment, and substantial details were already on record. The appeals were ordered to be posted for hearing on merits on both original and additional grounds.
|
