9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of treating current year's unabsorbed depreciation as 'loss' for the purpose of computation of undisclosed income under section 158BB. 2. Validity of block assessment where aggregated total income (including undisclosed income) determined under section 158BC for each assessment year is a loss. 3. Allowability of unabsorbed depreciation as a deduction while computing income for the block period under section 158BC. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Treating Current Year's Unabsorbed Depreciation as 'Loss': The Assessing Officer treated the unabsorbed depreciation of the current year as 'loss' for computing undisclosed income under section 158BB. The assessee contended that if the current year's depreciation exceeds the business income, the resultant figure should be 'Nil' and not 'loss'. The Assessing Officer relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Garden Silk Wvg. Factory v. CIT, stating that depreciation loss and business loss are the same. The Tribunal, however, found that the Assessing Officer misread the decision, and observed that unabsorbed depreciation should not be treated as 'loss' for the purpose of computing undisclosed income. The Tribunal concluded that the computation of income at 'Nil' for those years where the depreciation admissible for the current year exceeds the business profits is correct. 2. Validity of Block Assessment with Aggregated Loss: The assessee argued that the computation of concealed income under section 158BB envisages a positive figure of assessment based on search materials, and in this case, the total aggregate income was a loss of Rs.11,13,75,788. The Tribunal held that the computation of undisclosed income requires a positive figure, and if the aggregate is a loss, it does not satisfy the provisions of the section. The Tribunal noted that the intention of the Legislature seems to be to levy taxes only on those who have positive income unearthed by search. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the levy of tax under section 113 is not valid when the total aggregate income is a loss. 3. Allowability of Unabsorbed Depreciation: The assessee contended that the unabsorbed depreciation should be allowed as a deduction out of the income for the relevant years while computing the income for the block period. The Tribunal observed that the provisions of section 32(2) stipulate that if the profits of the business are inadequate to give effect to the admissible depreciation, then the depreciation allowable gets split into two parts: one part relating to the assessment year for which it is current depreciation and the second part, which statutorily is made to relate to the allowance and deductions of the following previous year. The Tribunal concluded that the balance of the current year's depreciation ceases to be the allowance of the current year and becomes the allowance of the following previous year. Therefore, the unabsorbed depreciation cannot be deducted in the current year's computation of income under section 158BB. Separate Judgments Delivered: The learned Accountant Member dissented from the view of the Vice President, holding that the right of set-off of depreciation under section 32(2) is available only in regular assessments and not in block assessments. The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member, concluding that the undisclosed income of Rs.1,46,02,752 computed by the Assessing Officer can be brought to tax under section 113. The appeal was dismissed in accordance with the majority view.
|
