9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of additions made on account of disallowance of bonus and interest payable to IDBI. 2. Deletion of additional tax charged under section 143(1A) of the Income-tax Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Deletion of Additions Made on Account of Disallowance of Bonus and Interest Payable to IDBI: The revenue challenged the order of the CIT(Appeals) for deleting the additions of Rs. 2,91,256 and Rs. 62,976, which were disallowed due to lack of proof of payment. The revenue argued that, as per the proviso to section 43B of the Income-tax Act, all evidence supporting the claim should be filed along with the return of income. The revenue relied on the Assessing Officer's order under section 154 of the Act. Conversely, the assessee's counsel referred to CBDT Circular No. 669, dated 25th October 1993, which directed revenue authorities to consider all evidence submitted during rectification proceedings under section 154, even if not filed with the return. Upon reviewing the submissions and the Board's Circular, the Tribunal found that the evidence supporting the assessee's claim was filed during rectification proceedings and should have been accepted by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s order, agreeing that the evidence should be considered in light of the Board's Circular. 2. Deletion of Additional Tax Charged Under Section 143(1A) of the Income-tax Act: The revenue contested the CIT(Appeals)'s decision to delete the additional tax charged, arguing that, post-amendment by the Finance Act, 1993, additional tax is chargeable where the loss declared in the return is reduced due to adjustments under section 143(1)(a). The revenue maintained that the loss declared by the assessee was reduced, even after allowing the claims for bonus and interest payable to IDBI. The assessee countered that, at the time of filing the return, the amendment under section 143(1A) was not in effect. Moreover, the assessee, being a Co-operative Society engaged in banking and providing credit facilities, was exempt from income tax under section 80P. Therefore, disallowing the claims would not affect the declared loss, and section 143(1A) should not apply. The assessee also argued that the additional tax was not computed according to existing provisions, and the issue was debatable, as noted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal examined the relevant provisions and judicial pronouncements, noting that the amendment to section 143(1A) aimed to deter incorrect returns by imposing additional tax where declared losses are reduced or converted into income. However, since the assessee was exempt from income tax under section 80P, the reduction in declared loss due to adjustments did not warrant additional tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the amendment targeted income-tax payees who could benefit from declaring losses, which did not apply to the exempted assessee. The Tribunal also agreed with the assessee's argument that debatable issues should not be subject to prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a). The Assessing Officer should issue a notice and conduct a regular assessment for such issues. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was not liable for additional tax, confirming the CIT(Appeals)'s order and deciding the appeal in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed.
|
