9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Appeal against CIT(A) order for asst. yr. 1993-94: (i) Unexplained capital addition, (ii) Unexplained lab equipment investment, (iii) Low household expenses withdrawals.
The first issue pertains to the addition of Rs. 1,07,655 as unexplained capital introduced in the books. The assessee claimed this amount as accumulated capital, supported by details of accretion to capital each year and gifts received during marriage, a common practice in society. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, emphasizing that the AO's action was unjustified as the appellant provided explanations and evidence. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A), noting the appellant's prompt responses to queries and submission of details regarding funds received at the time of marriage. The ITAT found the AO's conclusion flawed and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, highlighting the societal norms regarding gifts at marriages and the difficulty in proving such transactions. The second issue concerns the deletion of Rs. 10,000 addition for unexplained investment in lab equipment. The AO made this addition based on lack of supporting evidence, but the CIT(A) found it irrelevant for consideration in the assessment year 1993-94 as the equipment was purchased in the previous financial year. The ITAT concurred with the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the timing of the purchase made the addition inconsequential for the current assessment year. The final issue revolves around the deletion of Rs. 13,000 addition made on account of low withdrawals for household expenses. The husband of the assessee, a practicing doctor, withdrew sufficient funds for household expenses, and the maintenance of the assessee was considered his responsibility. The AO added Rs. 13,000, alleging low withdrawals, despite accepting the husband's expenses for household needs in previous years. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete this addition, reasoning that the husband's withdrawals were accepted by the Department for all family members, including the assessee, over several assessment years. In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the Department's appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 1993-94, upholding the deletions of additions related to unexplained capital, lab equipment investment, and low household expenses withdrawals based on detailed analysis and justifications provided by the CIT(A) and the assessee.
|
