9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Validity of action under sections 147, 148 for reassessment and reassessment order under section 143(3)/147. Analysis: The appeal was against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 1994-95. The main issue was the validity of the action under sections 147 and 148 for reassessment, along with the reassessment order under section 143(3)/147. The authorized representative of the assessee argued that the reasons for reopening the assessment were based on suspicion rather than a valid "reason to believe." They cited relevant case laws to support their argument that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) were vague and did not establish a direct nexus between the material and the belief of income escapement. The AO's reasons were considered vague, general, and non-specific, lacking a rational connection with the belief of income escapement. The material from the DDIT, Ahmedabad, was also found to be vague and did not indicate any taxable income of the assessee. Consequently, the initiation of proceedings for reassessment and the reassessment order were deemed legally invalid and not tenable. The reassessment was quashed based on these findings. The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded by the AO were insufficient to support the belief of income escapement and lacked a direct nexus with the material available. As a result, the initiation of proceedings for reassessment and the subsequent reassessment order were considered legally invalid and were quashed. Since the main issue of validity was decided in favor of the assessee, the remaining grounds related to factual merits of the assessment were not considered. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed based on the invalidity of the reassessment proceedings and order under sections 147 and 148.
|
