9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Justification of sustaining the addition of Rs. 28,950 on account of accrued interest. Analysis: 1. The only issue in this appeal was whether the CIT(A) was justified in upholding the addition of Rs. 28,950 on account of accrued interest. The assessee, a partnership firm, entered into a development agreement with another party, where certain instalments were to be paid. The other party failed to pay the 3rd instalment of Rs. 4,93,000 on time, leading to the Assessing Officer calculating interest income at Rs. 28,950. The assessee argued that no income had accrued since the interest was waived, supported by letters exchanged between the parties. 2. The legal position regarding income accrual under the Mercantile system of accounting was discussed. Income accrues when an enforceable debt is created in favor of the assessee, as established in the case law. Interest accrues day by day, even if not received immediately. The principle of real income dictates that no tax can be levied on a notional basis if the right to receive interest is given up or waived before its accrual, but this does not apply if the waiver occurs after accrual. 3. The Tribunal considered the facts of the case and the agreement's clause entitling the assessee to interest in case of default. It was found that an enforceable debt was created due to the default in payment, leading to interest income accruing to the assessee. The waiver of interest occurred after the accrual period, aligning with the legal precedent. The decision in the case of Birla Gwalior (P.) Ltd. was distinguished from the present case based on the nature of income accrual and waiver timing. 4. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The waiver of interest post-accrual did not exempt the assessee from taxation, as the interest income had accrued during the default period. The agreement's lack of a specified date for interest payment did not absolve the assessee from tax liability, as the accrual principle governed the taxation of income. This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the legal principles, factual background, arguments presented, and the Tribunal's decision regarding the issue of accrued interest in the case.
|
