1981 (2) TMI 144 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Penalty under s. 271(1)(a) for late filing of return
2. Reasonable cause for delay in filing returns for asst. yr. 1973-74 and 1974-75
3. Appeal against levy of penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for the same assessment years

Analysis:

Issue 1: Penalty under s. 271(1)(a) for late filing of return
The assessee, a registered firm operating a lodging and boarding house, faced penalties for late filing of returns for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The delay in filing the return for 1973-74 was 7 months, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 2,570, while for 1974-75, the delay was 24 months, leading to a penalty of Rs. 10,600. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) assessed the income at amounts higher than those declared by the assessee, which were subsequently reduced by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC). The AAC considered the reasons for the delay, including mental strain due to a raid by the Sales Tax Department, and condoned the delays partially. Both the assessee and the Revenue appealed the decisions for the respective years.

Issue 2: Reasonable cause for delay in filing returns
The assessee claimed that the mental strain persisted beyond the date considered by the AAC, justifying further condonation of the delay for the assessment year 1974-75. The Revenue argued that the assessee had reasonable cause only for a limited period and questioned the validity of considering evidence from Sales Tax Proceedings. The counsel for the assessee cited legal precedent to support the presentation of additional evidence showing reasonable cause. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, finding it reasonable and dismissing all appeals related to penalties for the years 1973-74 and 1974-75.

Issue 3: Appeal against levy of penalty under s. 271(1)(c)
The assessee raised preliminary grounds against the levy of penalties under s. 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75, arguing that the ITO should have obtained previous approval from the Income-tax Appellate Commissioner (IAC) due to substantial additions to income. The Tribunal admitted these grounds, despite objections from the Departmental Representative. It was observed that the ITO had not complied with the statutory provisions requiring approval from the IAC for imposing penalties in such cases. Consequently, the penalties for both years were canceled, and the assessee's appeals were allowed.

This judgment highlights the importance of establishing reasonable cause for delays in filing returns and the necessity for proper compliance with statutory provisions when levying penalties under the Income Tax Act.