9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Whether the charitable trust would lose the exemption if any shares in a company other than a Government company or a corporation established by or under a Central, State, or Provincial Act are held after 30th November 1983. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeals involved in this case are related to the revisional orders of the CWT under the Wealth Tax Act and the IT Act for various assessment years. The appeals cover issues such as reopening of assessments, regular assessments, and orders passed under different sections of the IT Act. 2. The main issue in question is whether a charitable trust would lose its exemption if it holds shares in a company other than specified types after 30th November 1983. The judgment delves into the interpretation of relevant sections of the IT Act, specifically focusing on the holding of bonus shares after the cut-off date and its impact on the trust's exemption status. 3. The judgment discusses the provisions of section 11(5) of the IT Act, which outlines the conditions for investing and depositing money for charitable trusts. Holding shares in a company other than a Government company after the specified date would breach the conditions of section 11(5) read with section 11(2)(b) of the IT Act. 4. The CWT revised the assessment order for the assessment year 1985-86, citing errors that were prejudicial to the revenue's interest. The CWT contended that bonus shares held after the cut-off date were not exempt from income tax. Consequently, the assessments for various years were revisited and exemptions were denied based on the violation of relevant provisions. 5. The ITO, in line with the revision orders, denied exemptions for income violations for the assessment years 1985-86 and 1986-87. The assessments for other years were also reopened and exemptions were denied for similar violations. 6. The CIT(A) held that bonus shares could not be considered as corpus shares held before a specified date, leading to a violation of relevant provisions. The appeals were then brought before the Tribunal for consideration. 7. The Tribunal considered the retrospective amendment made by the Finance Act, 1992, which provided an exception in favor of bonus shares obtained in respect of shares forming part of the trust's corpus as of a specific date. The Tribunal concluded that the revisional and appellate orders were not justified in law, setting them aside and ruling in favor of the assessee. 8. The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, considering the retrospective amendment and the exemption eligibility of the trust's income and net wealth. No additional arguments were raised during the hearing, leading to the conclusion of the case with all appeals being allowed.
|
