Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1987 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1987 (9) TMI 265 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Classification of imported Molybdenum Glass Electrodes under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue: Classification of imported Molybdenum Glass Electrodes
The case involved the classification of Molybdenum Glass Electrodes imported by Alembic Glass Industries Ltd. The appellant claimed the goods should be reassessed under Heading 85.11 or 85.18/27(3) of the Customs Tariff Act. The Assistant Collector classified the goods under Heading 81.01/04(1) of CTA 75, attracting the same duty rate as 85.12 of CTA 75. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) upheld this classification, stating that the electrodes were used in glass melting industries and did not fall under Heading 85.18/27(3). The appellant appealed to the Tribunal, represented by Shri B.G. Sarang, who argued that the goods should be classified under Heading 85.11(1) of CTA 1975, emphasizing that the electrodes were parts of a furnace and essential for glass melting. The respondent, represented by Shri J. Gopinath, contended that the case was similar to a previous judgment involving the same appellant and argued for dismissal based on lack of new arguments. The Tribunal examined the purity of the imported electrodes and concluded that they should be classified under Heading 81.01/04(1) of CTA 75, affirming the lower authorities' decision. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, stating that the arguments presented did not warrant a different classification and did not necessitate referral to a larger Bench.

The Tribunal noted that the appellant had not challenged the earlier judgment before the Supreme Court, which had addressed the same issue and involved identical goods imported by the same appellant. Despite the appellant's reliance on Section Note 1(f) to Section XVI, the Tribunal found that the previous decision must be accepted as final. President S. Venkatesan agreed with Member (J) Harish Chander's conclusion to reject the appeal based on the precedent set by the Tribunal's earlier decision. Member (T) I.J. Rao also concurred with the rejection of the appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the classification of Molybdenum Glass Electrodes under Heading 81.01/04(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, based on the purity of the imported goods and the precedent set by a previous judgment involving the same appellant. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the importance of accepting established decisions in similar cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates