Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1989 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1989 (8) TMI 172 - AT - Central Excise

Issues involved: Appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi regarding entitlement to benefit of Notification No. 237/75 for Runners and Risers during steel ingots manufacture.

Main Issue - Entitlement to Benefit of Notification No. 237/75:
The main issue revolved around whether Runners and Risers during steel ingots manufacture were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 237/75. The Collector (Appeals) held that Runners and Risers could be classified as steel ingots or steel melting scrap based on their utility, and that relevant notifications applied to both. However, the appellant argued that the Collector's decision contradicted a previous Tribunal ruling and cited legal provisions to support their stance.

Contention on Facts and Law:
The appellant contended that the Collector (Appeals) erred in factual findings and legal interpretation. They argued that full details were disclosed in the classification list approved by the Assistant Collector, indicating no suppression of facts. They also referenced Board clarifications and previous orders to support their claim that Runners and Risers fell under the exemption notification.

Approval of Classification List and Responsibility:
The Tribunal noted that the approval of the classification list was crucial and indicated that both departmental officers and assesses had responsibilities in such matters. The Assistant Collector was expected to carefully consider details before approval, ensuring accurate classification. The approval process required active decision-making and thorough understanding of the goods being manufactured.

Time Bar and Conclusion:
The Tribunal found that the demand raised in the Show Cause Notice was time-barred, as it exceeded the statutory period. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the matter did not need further examination on merits due to the time limitation issue. The decision highlighted the importance of adherence to legal procedures and responsibilities in customs matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates