Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2024 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (4) TMI 74 - HC - Service Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the Show Cause Notice dated 12th April 2019.
2. Eligibility and procedural compliance under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
3. Requirement of issuing Form SVLDRS 2 and granting a personal hearing.

Summary:

Validity of the Show Cause Notice dated 12th April 2019:

The Petitioner, a Partnership Firm engaged in technical testing and certification services, was issued a Show Cause Notice on 12th April 2019 by the service tax department, alleging a discrepancy of Rs. 19,80,37,410/- between the Income Tax Returns and service tax returns. The notice proposed to demand and recover Rs. 2,44,77,423/- along with interest and penalty. The Petitioner contended that the turnover declared in Form ST-3 was not NIL as alleged and had already deposited Rs. 1,70,46,567/- which was not considered in the notice.

Eligibility and Procedural Compliance under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019:

The Petitioner filed Form SVLDRS 1 under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, declaring Rs. 2,44,77,423/- as tax dues. According to Section 124(1)(a), the amount payable under the Scheme was 50% of the tax dues, i.e., Rs. 1,22,38,711.50. The Petitioner mistakenly declared Rs. 1,70,46,567/- under "Reason for disagreement" instead of the "Pre-deposit column". Consequently, Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 issued Form SVLDRS 3, disallowing the pre-deposit and demanding Rs. 1,22,38,711.50. The Petitioner argued that as the deposited amount exceeded the tax dues, the payable amount should be NIL.

Requirement of Issuing Form SVLDRS 2 and Granting a Personal Hearing:

The Petitioner contended that under Section 127(2) of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and Rule 6 of the Sabka Vishwas Rules, the Designated Committee was required to issue Form SVLDRS 2 and grant a personal hearing if there was a dispute regarding the amount payable. Despite disputing the amount in Form SVLDRS 1, no Form SVLDRS 2 was issued, nor was a personal hearing granted, violating the Scheme's provisions and principles of natural justice.

Judgment:

The Court held that the Designated Committee's action of issuing Form SVLDRS 3 without issuing Form SVLDRS 2 and without granting a personal hearing was in violation of Section 127 of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Rule 6 of the Sabka Vishwas Rules, and principles of natural justice. The Court quashed Form SVLDRS 3 and remanded the matter back to the Designated Committee to issue Form SVLDRS 2, grant a personal hearing, and pass a reasoned order within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates