Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (10) TMI 1488 - HC - Income TaxPenalty imposed u/s 270A when the rectification application itself was pending - while computing the tax liability of the petitioner the AO did not give credit of the TDS and charged interest for alleged non-payment of taxes - case of the petitioner is that since non-grant of the TDS was a mistake apparent on a face of the record the petitioner made an application under Section 154 seeking correction of this apparent mistake - due to Technical difficulties delayed the uploading of the application but it was eventually filed on 27 April 2022 HELD THAT - The petitioner would be correct in his contention that in view of the subsequent developments and in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court a rectification order was passed. Also the demand raised under the rectification order which was for payment of tax of Rs. 303/- was complied by the petitioner. In this view of the matter the penalty proceedings are also rendered inconsequential as the very foundation of such penalty proceedings stood extinguished in view of rectification order being passed. Admittedly the demand and penalty proceedings under the Assessment Order dated 30 March 2022 would lose their sanctity in view of the rectification order dated 3 January 2023 as necessarily the assessment order has merged into the rectification order dated 3 January 2023. In view of the clear position which was brought about from the compliance of the rectification order 3 January 2023 the application of the petitioner under Section 270AA of the Act although was filed on 7 January 2023 need not be taken forward. This for the reason that in view of the order dated 3 January 2023 passed on the rectification application of the petitioner the issue in regard to the demands as also the penalty or any other issue which would possibly arise under the Assessment Order dated 30 March 2022 which was apparently held to be not correct was accordingly interfered in the rectification proceedings. Thus the assessment order as originally passed cannot continue to prejudice the petitioner for any actions to be taken thereunder. In the aforesaid circumstances we are inclined to allow the petition. The order passed u/s 270A is quashed and set aside.
|