Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2025 (2) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (2) TMI 128 - AAAR - GST


ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal issues considered in this judgment are:

  • Whether the supply of pencil sharpeners along with pencils constitutes a 'composite supply' or 'mixed supply' under the CGST Act, 2017.
  • The appropriate Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) code to be used for the supply of these products.
  • Whether the inclusion of a sharpener with a nominal value in the supply impacts the rate of tax, and if so, what the applicable rate and HSN code should be.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

1. Nature of Supply: Composite or Mixed

The relevant legal framework is provided by the definitions of 'composite supply' and 'mixed supply' under the CGST Act, 2017. A composite supply involves goods or services that are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other, with one being a principal supply. Conversely, a mixed supply involves two or more individual supplies made together for a single price, not constituting a composite supply.

The Court examined whether the supply of pencils, erasers, and sharpeners in a single package (DOMS A1 pencil) is naturally bundled. The GAAR concluded that these items are not naturally bundled, as they can be supplied independently and are not made in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business. The Court concurred with GAAR's findings, noting the absence of a principal supply and the lack of natural bundling.

The appellant's reliance on the explanatory notes from the World Customs Organization (WCO) and the General Rules for Interpretation (GRI) was considered. However, the Court found that the product did not meet the criteria for a composite supply under Rule 3(b) of the GRI, as it did not have an essential character provided by one component.

2. Determination of HSN Code

The appellant argued that the HSN code should be determined using the GRI, similar to the method used under Customs law. However, the Court emphasized that the CGST Act provides specific rules for determining the nature of the supply and the applicable tax rate. The Court concluded that the HSN code for a mixed supply should be that of the product attracting the highest rate of tax among the items supplied.

3. Impact of Sharpener Inclusion on Tax Rate

The Court agreed with GAAR's ruling that the inclusion of a sharpener, even with a nominal value, affects the tax rate. The applicable tax rate for the mixed supply is determined by the item with the highest rate of tax in the package. The Court noted the changes in GST rates for pencil sharpeners and confirmed that the applicable rate for the mixed supply would be 12%, with the HSN code corresponding to the highest taxed item.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Court upheld the GAAR's ruling that the supply of pencils, sharpeners, and erasers in the DOMS A1 pencil package constitutes a 'mixed supply'. The Court emphasized that the supply is not naturally bundled and lacks a principal supply, thus falling under the definition of mixed supply as per the CGST Act.

The Court confirmed that the HSN code for the mixed supply should be that of the item with the highest tax rate, aligning with the provisions of Section 8 of the CGST Act. The ruling clarified that the inclusion of a sharpener impacts the tax rate, which is 12% for the mixed supply, with the HSN code being that of the pencil sharpener or pencils, depending on the highest rate.

The appeal by M/s DOMS Industries P Ltd. was rejected, and the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2022/52 dated 30.12.2022 was upheld, confirming the classification and tax implications as determined by GAAR.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates