2010 (6) TMI 54 - HC - Income Tax

Interest u/s 244A interest on refund of tax Held that Section 244A (2) provides that in the event the proceeding resulting in refund has been delayed for reasons attributable to the assessee the period of delay so attributable shall be excluded from the period for which the interest is payable. In the present case Section 244 A(2) is clearly not attracted. The proceeding resulting in the refund was not delayed for reasons attributable to the assessee. Though the TDS Certificates were not submitted with the return and were filed during the course of the assessment proceedings the Tribunal has noted that the tax was in fact deducted at source at the right time interest allowed

Summary

Issues:
1) Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the correctness of the order of the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to grant interest under Section 244A.

Analysis:
The High Court of Bombay dealt with an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on the correctness of the Tribunal's order directing the Assessing Officer to grant interest under Section 244A. The case involved the filing of a return of income by the assessee for assessment year 2001-01, with subsequent submission of revised returns. The assessment proceedings resulted in the determination of income under Section 115JA, along with the submission of TDS certificates during the assessment process.

The crux of the issue revolved around the interpretation of Section 244A(2), which excludes the period of delay attributable to the assessee from the interest payable on refunds. The court noted that in this case, Section 244A(2) was not applicable as the delay in the refund process was not due to reasons attributable to the assessee. Despite the TDS certificates not being initially submitted with the return, the Tribunal found that the tax was deducted at the correct time, leading to the allowance of the benefit of TDS to the assessee.

Consequently, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that since the tax was deducted and deposited in a timely manner, the denial of interest under Section 244A solely based on the absence of TDS certificates with the return was unwarranted. The court concluded that the appeal did not raise any substantial question of law and dismissed it accordingly.

The judgment highlights the importance of timely tax compliance and the application of relevant provisions such as Section 244A in determining the entitlement to interest on refunds. The decision underscores the significance of adherence to procedural requirements while ensuring that taxpayers are not unduly penalized for technical deficiencies that do not impact the substantive tax obligations.