Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2010 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (1) TMI 448 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Jurisdiction of Single Member Bench vs. Division Bench

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the issue of whether an appeal should be heard by a Single Member Bench or a Division Bench based on the amount involved and the proper appreciation of facts by the registry. Initially, the Single Member Bench referred the matter to the Division Bench due to the amount involved being more than Rs. 10 lakhs. However, during subsequent hearings before the Division Bench, the correct position regarding jurisdiction was not brought to light by either party. The learned Advocate for the respondent highlighted the penalty under challenge exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs and the discrepancy in the registry's listing decision. Both the Advocate and the Departmental Representative agreed that the matter should be placed before the Division Bench. The judgment emphasizes the importance of correctly filling appeal memoranda to indicate the issues and amounts involved, urging the registry to assign cases to the appropriate Bench from the beginning to avoid such discrepancies. It also stresses the responsibility of both sides to verify jurisdiction before a Single Member Bench and allows the Bench to address jurisdictional issues during the hearing.

In conclusion, considering the lack of jurisdiction pointed out by the Advocate and supported by the SDR, the judgment directs the registry to reevaluate the matter and take necessary actions to ensure the case is appropriately placed before the relevant Bench for further proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates