9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (4) TMI 594 - AT - CustomsDismissal of appeal by tribunal for non-compliance with stay order, before appeal against stay order disposed by HC Facts of dismissal of appeal not placed before HC by Revenue - This is an instance how abuse to process of law was made by the litigants to cause prejudice to the interest of Revenue. It has therefore become necessary to send a copy of this order to the Chairman of Central Board of Excise & Customs to guide its officers to properly brief the matter to the Counsel engaged in High Courts so that Revenue s case properly placed before the High Court. This is not only the instance where laxity of Revenue has been noticed, but also several instances are coming to the notice of Tribunal which compels us to have the impression as above. case is adjourned
Issues Involved:
1. Restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit order. 2. Failure of Revenue to present facts before the High Court leading to dismissal of appeal. 3. Lack of proper briefing by Revenue's Counsel affecting the outcome of cases. 4. Verification of the challan for the deposited amount. 5. Directions to send copies of the order to relevant authorities for appropriate action. Analysis: Issue 1: Restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit order The appellant filed a Misc. application seeking restoration of the appeal after their non-compliance with the pre-deposit order led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal highlighted the history of the case, where the appellant failed to make the required deposit within the specified timeframe, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal expressed surprise at the Revenue's failure to inform the High Court about the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal, emphasizing the abuse of the legal process to prejudice the Revenue's interests. Issue 2: Failure of Revenue to present facts before the High Court The Tribunal criticized the Revenue for not presenting the complete factual matrix before the High Court, leading to the dismissal of the appellant's appeal. The Tribunal noted instances of laxity on the part of the Revenue and emphasized the need to ensure proper briefing of cases before High Courts to protect the Revenue's interests. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of presenting cases effectively to avoid adverse outcomes due to inadequate representation. Issue 3: Lack of proper briefing by Revenue's Counsel Citing a judgment from the case of Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, the Tribunal reiterated the importance of assigning experienced and competent Counsel to handle cases with far-reaching effects. The Tribunal emphasized the need for Counsel to analyze legal provisions thoroughly and present arguments effectively to ensure that public justice is not compromised. The Tribunal expressed concern over the lack of effort by Counsel in analyzing legal matters, urging the relevant departments to organize their affairs to ensure proper representation in legal proceedings. Issue 4: Verification of the challan for the deposited amount The Tribunal directed the Revenue to verify the copy of the challan provided by the appellant to ensure the deposit of the specified amount. This verification was deemed necessary before further action could be taken regarding the restoration of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying the deposited amount to maintain transparency and accuracy in the legal proceedings. Issue 5: Directions to send copies of the order to relevant authorities The Tribunal decided to send copies of the order to the Chairman of Central Board of Excise & Customs, the Registrar of the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, and other relevant parties for appropriate action. Notices were issued to the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Appellant to explain their positions regarding the case. The Tribunal scheduled a future hearing date to address the matter further and ensure that all parties involved were informed of the proceedings. This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues addressed by the Tribunal and the actions taken to address the non-compliance, lack of proper representation, and the need for thorough verification in legal proceedings.
|
