9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Assessment of tax under the Coorg Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1951 for the year 1952-53. - Claim of certain sums received not constituting income and the net result being a loss. - Dispute regarding carrying forward the unabsorbed loss for set off against the income of the next year. - Refusal by the assessing authority to revise the assessment order for the year 1953-54 to give effect to the previous year's loss. Analysis: The judgment delivered by the High Court of Karnataka addressed a matter under the Coorg Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1951, concerning the assessment of tax for the year 1952-53. The petitioner had disputed that certain sums received did not qualify as income and claimed that the overall result for the year was a loss. Initially, the petitioner's appeal was unsuccessful, but upon a reference to the High Court, their contention was accepted. This decision was later affirmed by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer issued an order to carry forward the unabsorbed loss of the petitioner to the next year for set off against the income. However, there was a discrepancy in the assessment for the year 1953-54, which had been completed without considering the loss from the previous year for set off against the profits of that year. The court highlighted Section 14 of the Act, similar to Section 24(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, which mandated the carrying forward of losses for set off against income in subsequent years. The court emphasized that the assessing authority had a statutory obligation to give effect to such provisions and set off the loss from the previous year against the income of the following year. The court criticized the department's refusal to revise the assessment for 1953-54 despite the clear requirement to do so under the law. It was noted that the department's stance amounted to denying the petitioner the benefit of the court's decision. The court concluded that the assessing authority was obligated to implement the order issued in accordance with the law and directed the authority to revise the assessment for the year 1953-54 to give effect to the previous year's loss. In response to the petitioner's plea for relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the court directed the Agricultural Income-tax Officer to revise the assessment for the year 1953-54 to ensure the proper set off of the carried forward loss from the preceding year. The judgment underscored the statutory duty of the assessing authority to adhere to the provisions of the law and rejected the department's refusal to revise the assessment order. Consequently, the court issued a writ directing the assessing authority to comply with the order issued on December 21, 1967, for carrying forward the loss and set off against the income of the subsequent year. The court made no ruling regarding costs in this matter.
|
