Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1994 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1994 (4) TMI 190 - AT - Customs

Issues involved: Appeal against orders of Collector of Customs and Collector of Central Excise regarding levy of additional duty of Customs (CVD) on unassembled photocopying machines and liability to Central Excise duty on clearance of assembled photocopier.

Issue 1 - Levy of additional duty of Customs (CVD) on unassembled photocopying machines:
The appellant imported unassembled photocopying machines under Item 33D of the Central Excise Tariff. The Assistant Collector of Customs held that all components imported comprised complete machines assessable under 33D. The Collector (Appeals) upheld this decision based on Interpretation Rules to the Tariff. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions and held that no new product emerged from the assembly, thus supporting the assessment under Item 33D. The appeal by the assessee was rejected.

Issue 2 - Liability to Central Excise duty on clearance of assembled photocopier:
The Department asked for Central Excise duty under Item 33D on the assembled machine cleared from the factory. The Assistant Collector granted a refund, stating that mere assembly did not amount to manufacture. The Collector (Appeals) upheld this decision, noting that duty was already paid on unassembled machines. The Tribunal cited previous cases to support the view that assembly did not constitute manufacture, leading to the rejection of the Department's appeal.

Separate Judgement:
The Tribunal rejected the Miscellaneous application by the Department, which sought a rehearing based on an application by the appellant. The Tribunal found no substance in the application, as the appeals were disposed of based on precedents and rulings, and thus, the application was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates