1996 (11) TMI 229 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues:
- Benefit of exemption under Notification 56/95 for imported moulds

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MADRAS pertained to the benefit of exemption under Notification 56/95 for moulds imported by the appellants. The learned SDR for the department argued that the concession is only available if the moulds are produced within a factory for captive consumption, as per the wording of the Notification and budget instructions. On the other hand, the respondents' counsel contended that under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, imported goods are deemed to be manufactured by the importer, making them eligible for exemption even if imported. The Tribunal considered both arguments and observed that the benefit of the Notification is indeed limited to moulds produced and used within the same factory, as indicated by the legislative intent and budget instructions cited. The Tribunal emphasized the strict interpretation of notifications and concluded that the imported moulds in question did not meet the criteria outlined in the Notification, thereby ruling in favor of the revenue department and setting aside the lower authority's decision.

In the detailed analysis, the Tribunal highlighted the specific items eligible for exemption under Notification 56/95, emphasizing that the concession is contingent upon production and consumption within the same factory. The Tribunal noted that while exemptions may be granted for goods used in notified finished products or locations other than the production site, such flexibility was not applicable in this case due to the restrictive language of the Notification. The Tribunal rejected the argument that Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act created a fiction deeming imported goods as manufactured by the importer, clarifying that the section primarily concerns the duty measure for imported goods and does not alter the eligibility criteria for exemptions. By strictly interpreting the Notification's language and considering the legislative intent, the Tribunal concluded that the imported moulds did not qualify for the exemption, leading to the decision in favor of the revenue department and overturning the lower authority's ruling.