1997 (8) TMI 200 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues:
- Interpretation of Notification No. 281/84-Cus regarding the benefit of exemption for Winchester Disk Drives with controllers.
- Whether disk drives with controllers are covered under the description of "Winchester Disk Drive" for the purpose of the notification.

Analysis:
The Revenue Appeal challenged the order of the Collector (Appeals), Madras, which extended the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 281/84-Cus to Winchester Disk Drives with controllers imported by the Respondents. The Revenue argued that the benefit should only apply to simple disk drives, not disk drives with controllers, as the controller performs a distinct function independent of the disk drives. On the other hand, the Respondents contended that disk drives with controllers are essentially the same as disk drives, as the controller is embedded within the disk drive itself. The Tribunal examined technical literature and definitions to determine the nature of Winchester Disk Drives and controllers in the context of the notification.

The Tribunal analyzed the technical literature, including the Penguin Dictionary of Information Technology and Computer Science, to understand Winchester Disk Drives as a form of rigid disk drive with non-removable disks. It was noted that Winchester Disk Drives are small, sealed, and have a storage capacity ranging from ten to several hundred megabytes. The definition of magnetic storage was also considered to ascertain the nature of Winchester Disk Drives and their components. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of determining whether disk drives with controllers fall within the description of "Winchester Disk Drive" under the notification.

Ultimately, the Tribunal agreed with the Revenue's argument that the addition of a controller to the disk drive changes its character and functionality, taking it outside the scope of the exemption under the notification. The Tribunal rejected the argument based on a certificate issued by the Department of Electronics, stating that it pertained to magnetic disks, not disk drives with controllers. Since the notification only covers simple storage disk drives, and not disk drives with controllers, the benefit of the exemption could not be extended to the imported goods. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order and allowed the Revenue Appeal.