Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1997 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1997 (8) TMI 303 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Classification of goods under Tariff Heading 2202.90, retrospective demand raised, applicability of notification under Section 11C.
Classification of Goods under Tariff Heading 2202.90: The appeal concerns the classification of goods labeled as REFRESH. The Chartered Accountant representing the appellant concedes that the issue is settled against the assessee based on a prior tribunal decision. The tribunal previously ruled in a similar case involving the same party that goods like REFRESH fall under Tariff Heading 2202.90, not 2001.10. The tribunal referred to explanatory notes and a specific notification to support this classification. The tribunal reiterated its stance that fruit pulp-based drinks are correctly classified under CET 2202.90, in line with the explanation notes and Notification No. 87/91 issued for fruit-based drinks under Heading 2202.90. Retrospective Demand Raised: The appellant's Chartered Accountant argued that any demand should have been raised prospectively. Citing a judgment from the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhiwani Textile Mills, the appellant sought to limit the demand to future transactions. However, the tribunal, in line with its previous decision and following the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Ballarpur Industries Ltd v. Asst. Collector of Customs & C.Ex., held that the demand could be made retrospectively for a past period of six months. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the demand for the prior period was justified based on the Supreme Court's decision. Applicability of Notification under Section 11C: The Chartered Accountant informed the tribunal that a notification under Section 11C was issued for part of the period in question. The tribunal directed the lower authority to consider this notification when calculating the duty demand, if it applies to the appellants. This instruction ensures that the duty demand is assessed taking into account any relevant notifications issued during the relevant period.
|