2000 (10) TMI 436 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues:
1. Violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of cross-examination of Investigating Officers.
2. Incorrect appropriation of sale proceeds of confiscated goods under the Customs Act.

Issue 1: Violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of cross-examination of Investigating Officers:
The judgment addresses the issue of violation of natural justice principles as the appellant had sought cross-examination of Investigating Officers, which was not granted during the adjudication process. The appellant's Advocate presented an affidavit stating that the Investigating Officers were not summoned for cross-examination, and the Commissioner did not provide another opportunity for cross-examination. The Tribunal found that the adjudication proceedings were rushed without cross-examination, violating natural justice principles. The judgment concluded that the order should be set aside and remanded for re-adjudication with a clear direction for cross-examination of witnesses.

Issue 2: Incorrect appropriation of sale proceeds of confiscated goods under the Customs Act:
The judgment highlighted an error in the order of adjudication where goods valued at Rs. 2,00,37,350 were confiscated, and the sale proceeds of Rs. 1,47,55,415 were appropriated to the Government without granting an option for redemption. The Tribunal pointed out that the Customs Act only allows appropriation of sale proceeds under specific sections, and the order lacked clarity on whether the confiscation was absolute or not. The judgment deemed the appropriation of sale proceeds without providing reasons and without offering an option for redemption as incorrect in law. Consequently, the order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for re-adjudication in accordance with the law.

In conclusion, the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai addressed issues related to the violation of natural justice principles due to the lack of cross-examination of Investigating Officers and the incorrect appropriation of sale proceeds of confiscated goods under the Customs Act. The Tribunal set aside the original order and remanded the matter for re-adjudication to ensure compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice.