Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (9) TMI 534 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Classification of regulators for electric fans
Classification under Heading 8414.20 vs. 8414.99: The central issue in the judgment revolves around the classification of regulators for electric fans manufactured by the appellants. The appellants argue that the regulators should be classified under heading 8414.20 of the tariff, while the department contends that they fall under sub-heading 8414.99. The key point of contention is whether the regulators are considered parts or accessories of the electric fans. Interpretation of Tariff Headings and Notes: The appellants rely on Note 2 of Section XVI of the tariff to support their classification argument. They argue that regulators, being parts of fans, should be classified under Heading 84.14, specifically sub-heading 20 for electric fans. However, the tribunal rejects this argument, emphasizing that an article cannot be simultaneously considered a part and an accessory. It clarifies that a regulator for a ceiling fan is an accessory as the fan can function without it, unlike a pedestal or table fan where the regulator is integral. Application of Harmonised System of Nomenclature: The tribunal analyzes the Harmonised System of Nomenclature Explanatory Notes to understand the classification of accessories, noting that regulators are correctly regarded as accessories for electric fans. It highlights that the function of a regulator is to regulate the speed of the fan blades by controlling the electric current to the motor, making it an accessory rather than a part of the fan. Rejection of Circular Interpretation: The judgment dismisses the reliance on circulars issued by the Board for classification, emphasizing that the tribunal is not bound by such circulars. It clarifies that the focus is on the correct classification of regulators themselves, not their clearance along with fans. The tribunal rules out the application of Notes 4 and 5 of Section XVI of the tariff in this context. Consistency with Precedent and Final Decision: The tribunal refers to a previous decision in M.K. Electric (India) Ltd. v. CCE and aligns with the conclusion that regulators are accessories of electric fans. Despite the appellant's argument based on an older circular, the tribunal upholds the classification of regulators under sub-heading 8414.99. Ultimately, the appeals are dismissed, affirming the classification of regulators for electric fans under the relevant tariff sub-heading.
|