Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 1981 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1981 (3) TMI 178 - HC - Companies Law

Issues involved: Application by official liquidator u/s 446(2)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 for recovery of debt due from respondents. Question of limitation raised by respondents.

Details of the Judgment:

Claim and Resistance: Official liquidator sought payment of Rs. 2,323.50 from respondents, who denied liability based on promissory note. Respondents challenged jurisdiction, contended application was time-barred.

Argument on Limitation: Respondents argued application filed after prescribed period. Official liquidator contended application within time as per Act and Indian Limitation Act.

Precedent and Interpretation: Referring to Faridabad Cold Storage case, Full Bench held official liquidator's claim enforceable under section 446(2)(b) of the Act. Relevant date for limitation computation is date of winding-up order.

Decision: Court agreed with Full Bench, found official liquidator's claim legally enforceable from date of petition for winding up. Application filed within permissible time frame, not time-barred. Respondents ordered to pay debt, costs, and interest.

Conclusion: Application allowed, respondents directed to pay specified amount to official liquidator with costs and interest.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates