Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This

Fresh Opportunity of hearing be granted when guidelines prescribed in Circular relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC has not been complied with

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

Fresh Opportunity of hearing be granted when guidelines prescribed in Circular relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC has not been complied with
CA Bimal Jain By: CA Bimal Jain
July 22, 2024
All Articles by: CA Bimal Jain       View Profile
  • Contents

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of R.S. MARKETING AND LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 889 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, set aside the adjudication order and remanded the matter back for reconsideration wherein the guidelines prescribed in Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated December 27, 2022 (“the Circular”) relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC has not been complied with.

Facts:

R.S Marketing and Logistics Private Limited (“the Petitioner”), filed a writ petition against an order dated May 2, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by the Revenue department (“the Respondent”) guidelines prescribed in the Circular relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC

Issue:

Whether the Petitioner entitled to an opportunity of hearing when the procedure prescribed in the Circular relating to discrepancy in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A has not been complied with?

Held:

The Hon’ble Karnataka High court in R.S. MARKETING AND LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 889 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Noted that, the Circular is made applicable specifically w.r.t. FY 2017-2018 and procedure has been prescribed in case where the ITC claimed is less than five lakh rupees.
  • Opined that, the procedure prescribed in the Circular has not been complied with by the Respondent.
  • Held that, the Impugned Order is set aside and remitted the matter back for reconsideration.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

 

By: CA Bimal Jain - July 22, 2024

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates