Article Section | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM – AN UPDATE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM – AN UPDATE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reverse Charge Mechanism Section 68 (1) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (‘Act’ for short) provides that every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay service tax at the rate specified in section 66B (at present 14% - SBC – 5%) in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed. Section 68(2) introduced the reverse charge mechanism concept. The said section provides that Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in respect of such taxable services as may be notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette, the service tax thereon shall be paid by such person and in such manner as may be prescribed at the rate specified in section 66B and all the provisions of this Chapter shall apply to such person as if he is the person liable for paying the service tax in relation to such service. The proviso to the said section provides that the Central Government may notify the service and the extent of service tax which shall be payable by such person and the provisions of this Chapter shall apply to such person to the extent so specified and the remaining part of the service tax shall be paid by the service provider. Notification The Central Government, by virtue of powers given under Section 68(2) to it, notified some services under which the Government fixed the percentage payable by the service provider as well as the service recipient vide Notification No. 30/2012-Service Tax, dated 20.06.2012. This notification has been amended vide Notifications No. 45/2012-Service Tax, dated 07.08.2012; No. 10/2014-Service Tax, dated 11.07.2014, No. 7/2015-Service Tax, dated 01.03.2015 and No. 18/2016-Service Tax, dated 01.03.2016. Taxable services The said notification notified the following services (as on date, incorporating the amendments) subject to this notification as detailed below:
to any business entity located in the taxable territory;
Extent of liability The Government further fixed the liability of service tax payable by the service provider and the service recipient in respect of the services mentioned above as detailed in the following table:
Two explanations are given in the Notification. Explanation 1 provides that the person who pays or is liable to pay freight for the transportation of goods by road in goods carriage, located in the taxable territory shall be treated as the person who receives the service for the purpose of this notification. Explanation 2 provides that in works contract services, where both service provider and service recipient is the persons liable to pay tax, the service recipient has the option of choosing the valuation method as per choice, independent of valuation method adopted by the provider of service.
By: Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - April 2, 2016
Discussions to this article
Thanks for the article. Pl clarify who is liable to pay service tax in the case mentioned here. A director of a company is providing professional services viz technical consultancy or management consultancy to the company in which he is independent director. He is also receiving sitting fees for attending meetings. In my opinion service tax is payable by the director for professional fees. and company on sitting fees under reverse charge. Pl confirm.
The company is liable to pay service tax under the RCM on his professional service and the Director is not responsible for the same. This is my view.
What if a director in whole-time employment as a professional, gets remuneration ? (Incidentally, such remuneration is more than the normal limit under Companies Act as excepted for professional services)
In my view the service tax under RCM is not applicable for the Directors in employment. But this aspect will attract litigation.
Sir, SBC is taxable @ 0.5%, I saw in your article mentioned as 5%. Nice article. Thanks Sir.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||