Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (11) TMI 560 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxParticipation in auction - Notification dated June 11, 2007 challenged - Held that - High Court shall not adopt any generous and casual approach in applying the right to livelihood under article 21 of the Constitution of India to a case involving contractual dispute. In this case, the petitioner, having agreed to the terms and conditions of the notification and consciously participated in the auction and his bid was also confirmed is estopped from seeking any relief contrary to the tender notification. The tender conditions cannot be altered after the parties entered into the arena. The petitioner failed to comply with the conditions mentioned in the tender notification dated July 11, 2006, besides that the period of licence already expired and that the impugned notification dated June 11, 2007 was cancelled and fresh tender notification dated June 21, 2007 was issued by the third respondent in which the fourth respondent has offered the highest amount, this court is of the view that both the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed and accordingly, they are dismissed.
|