The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't ...

High Court ruled in favor of petitioner who missed replying to tax notice, setting aside order & allowing time to contest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't ...

High Court ruled in favor of petitioner who missed replying to tax notice, setting aside order & allowing time to contest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

Validity of assessment order - reply to the ASTM-10 notice was not taken into consideration - violation of principles of natural justice - Acknowledging the importance...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Shorter time to reply to notice - As an order passed under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an appealable order, in terms of...

The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST...

Breach of principles of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction - Excessive tax demand as a condition for remand - time lag of about two months between the show cause...

Impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided further opportunity after show cause notice nine months prior....

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand. Petitioner cited ongoing tax audit and father's illness for seeking...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the valuable right of the petitioner to defend through a reply and right to personal hearing was denied. The...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued u/s 148(A)(b) - Period of limitation - It is pertinent to mention here that since the defect committed by the Revenue by...

Principles of natural justice violated in tax adjudication process under U.P. GST Act, 2017. No opportunity for personal hearing provided to petitioner despite request...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Ex parte order passed based on old PAN number challenged. Society contended all transactions accounted for in audited books, returns filed with new PAN. Department...

Quick Updates: