The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't ...

High Court ruled in favor of petitioner who missed replying to tax notice, setting aside order & allowing time to contest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't ...

High Court ruled in favor of petitioner who missed replying to tax notice, setting aside order & allowing time to contest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of assessment order - reply to the ASTM-10 notice was not taken into consideration - violation of principles of natural justice - Acknowledging the importance...

The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST...

Breach of principles of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction - Excessive tax demand as a condition for remand - time lag of about two months between the show cause...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Shorter time to reply to notice - As an order passed under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an appealable order, in terms of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued u/s 148(A)(b) - Period of limitation - It is pertinent to mention here that since the defect committed by the Revenue by...

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

Initiation of CIRP - Demand Notice on unpaid Operational Debt - existence of dispute - When we look into the contents of allegations made in the Reply Notice, it is...

Wrongful claim of Input tax credit - bogus supply - vague SCN - SCN did contain the details about the foundation of the case - principles of natural justice - From the...

Issuance of pre-show cause notice consultation - demand of service tax - The contesting respondents were mandatorily required to have a pre-show cause notice...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Refund claim - rejection of refund claim without even dealing with the request of the petitioner seeking extension of time - The extension of time had been granted by...

Cancellation of petitioner's registration certificate - petitioner has omitted to file reply within time allowed and even within 30 days of receiving the notice - the...

Validity of assessment order - absence of three-month gap - The petitioner's counsel argued for a three-month gap between the show cause notice and assessment order,...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair chance to contest a tax demand due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B return and...

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

Quick Updates: