Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2012 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (7) TMI 754 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of the lease equalisation account as a deduction.
2. Compliance with RBI norms by the appellant, a non-banking financial company (NBFC).
3. Adherence to accounting standards and declaration of real income.
4. Classification of Lease Equalisation Reserve as an appropriation of profit.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of the Lease Equalisation Account as a Deduction:
The primary issue was whether the lease equalisation account amounting to Rs. 4,35,89,466 could be allowed as a deduction. The assessing authority disallowed this claim, stating it was neither a liability, an allowance, nor an expenditure. The Tribunal upheld this view, considering it an appropriation of profit. The court, however, noted that the lease equalisation charge was a method of recalibrating depreciation claimed by the assessee, which is in line with accounting standards and reflects the true and fair view of the accounts. The court concluded that the entire lease rental received does not constitute real income, as it includes both financing charges and capital recovery. Thus, the financing charge is the real income to be taxed, not the capital recovery.

2. Compliance with RBI Norms by the Appellant:
The appellant argued that as an NBFC, it followed RBI norms, which required the exclusion of lease equalisation charges from total rental receipts to reflect real income. The court acknowledged that the RBI's guidelines, along with ICAI standards, support this accounting treatment. The court emphasized that the accounting standards prescribed by the ICAI should be followed when determining whether there has been an accrual of liability or income.

3. Adherence to Accounting Standards and Declaration of Real Income:
The court examined whether the appellant's method of accounting, which included the lease equalisation charge, was consistent with accounting standards and reflected real income. The court cited various judgments, including those from the Apex Court, emphasizing that real income must be ascertained by making permissible deductions and that accounting standards should be adhered to. The court found that the appellant's method of separating financing charges from capital recovery and adjusting for lease equalisation charges was appropriate and provided a true and fair view of the financial statements.

4. Classification of Lease Equalisation Reserve as an Appropriation of Profit:
The Tribunal had concluded that the lease equalisation reserve was an appropriation of profit and thus could not be allowed as a deduction. However, the court disagreed, noting that the lease equalisation charge is a method of ensuring that only real income is taxed. The court held that the lease equalisation charge is not an appropriation of profit but a necessary adjustment to reflect the true income of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the assessee. It emphasized that the lease equalisation charge is a legitimate deduction as per accounting standards and reflects the real income of the assessee. The court also highlighted the importance of following RBI norms and ICAI guidelines in accounting practices for NBFCs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates