Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (12) TMI 46 - AT - Central ExciseAvailability of Cenvat credit on the welding electrodes used in maintenance and repair of the Machinery - Following the decision of court in case of Vandana Global Ltd. Versus CCE 2010 (4) TMI 133 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI held that - If Steel items are used in the manufacture of capital goods, they are required to be held as admissible cenvatable items. It is the Revenue s contention in the memo of appeal that as the steel items were used in repair and maintenance of parts and accessories of plant and machinery and for replacement of worn out parts. Even if that be so, the said items have to be held as used in fabrication of capital goods - no infirmity in the finding of Com(A)- appellant s appeal is allowed and Revenue s appeal is rejected.
Issues:
1. Availability of Cenvat credit on HR sheets, hot strip mill plates, and welding electrodes. 2. Interpretation of judgments regarding the use of welding electrodes for maintenance and repair. 3. Admissibility of Cenvat credit on various steel items used in the fabrication of capital goods. Analysis: Issue 1: Availability of Cenvat credit The appellate authority ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the availability of Cenvat credit on HR sheets and hot strip mill plates, considering them as inputs used in the manufacture of capital goods, which are further utilized in the production of sugar and molasses. However, the authority denied Cenvat credit on welding electrodes used for maintenance and repair of machinery. Issue 2: Interpretation of judgments on welding electrodes The judge referred to various High Court decisions, such as Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. vs. CCE, Hindustan Zinc vs. Union of India, and CCE, Bangalore-I vs. Alfred Herbert (India) Ltd., which supported the admissibility of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes used for maintenance and repair of machinery. The judge emphasized that these judgments are binding, and hence, the denial of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes was set aside. Issue 3: Admissibility of Cenvat credit on steel items The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Cenvat credit on various steel items, including HR sheets, G.C. Sheets, Plates, and Channels, as they were used in the fabrication of capital goods. The judge upheld this decision, citing the judgment in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. vs. CCE, which held that if steel items are used in the manufacture of capital goods, they qualify for Cenvat credit. The Revenue's argument that the steel items were used for repair and maintenance was rejected, as they were deemed to be used in the fabrication of capital goods. In conclusion, the appellate authority allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the availability of Cenvat credit on steel items and rejected the Revenue's appeal. The judgments cited from various High Courts and the interpretation of relevant legal precedents played a crucial role in determining the admissibility of Cenvat credit on different items used in the manufacturing process.
|