Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2014 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (8) TMI 895 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Taxability rate of tractor tyres and tubes under VAT Act.
2. Interpretation of subsequent clarificatory notifications.
3. Applicability of favorable interpretation in cases of ambiguity.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability Rate of Tractor Tyres and Tubes Under VAT Act:
The primary issue was whether tractor tyres and tubes should be taxed at an additional rate of 1% or 3% under the VAT Act. The revisionist argued that these items should be taxed at 1% as per Entry No. 1 of Notification No. 419 dated 31.3.2011, which covers goods described in Schedule II of the VAT Act, excluding declared goods. The Tribunal had erroneously determined the rate to be 3% under Entry No. 5, which generally covers tyres and tubes excluding those of cycles, cycle-rickshaws, and animal-driven vehicles.

2. Interpretation of Subsequent Clarificatory Notifications:
The subsequent Notification No. 898 dated 7.9.2012 clarified that tractor tyres and tubes were not included in the goods listed under Entry No. 5 of the earlier Notification dated 31.3.2011. This clarification indicated that the additional tax rate for tractor tyres and tubes should be 1%, aligning with Entry No. 1. The court acknowledged that the subsequent notification could be used to interpret the earlier ambiguous notification, supporting the revisionist's position.

3. Applicability of Favorable Interpretation in Cases of Ambiguity:
The court emphasized the principle that in cases of ambiguity in taxing statutes, the interpretation favoring the assessee should be adopted. The court cited multiple precedents to support this principle, including the Supreme Court's rulings in "Mauri Yeast India Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of U.P." and "Sun Export Corporation vs. Collector of Customs," which held that when two views are possible, the one favoring the assessee should be preferred.

Conclusion:
The court concluded that the only applicable entry for taxing tractor tyres and tubes was Entry No. 1 of the Notification dated 31.3.2011, which prescribed an additional tax rate of 1%. The Tribunal's order dated 23.01.2013 was deemed illegal and was set aside. All revisions were allowed, affirming that tractor tyres and tubes should be taxed at the additional rate of 1% and not 3%.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates