Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2014 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 226 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax.
2. Disallowance of laboratory expenses.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Surcharge on Sales Tax and Turnover Tax:

The first issue pertains to the disallowance of surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax paid by the assessee. The assessee, a wholesale trader of Indian Made Foreign Liquor and beer, argued that it is bound to pay these surcharges as per the provisions of "The Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957" and "The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963." The Assessing Officer disallowed these payments, and the CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, reasoning that such taxes are collected from purchasers and should not be deducted from the assessee's profits. The CIT(A) referred to section 40(iib) of the Income Tax Act, which denies certain deductions, to support this stance.

The assessee contended that these payments are statutory liabilities made wholly and exclusively for business purposes and should be allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee cited several Supreme Court judgments (e.g., S Kodar vs. State of Kerala) to argue that the surcharge and turnover tax are not appropriations of profit but necessary business expenses.

The Tribunal concluded that since the assessee follows the mercantile system of accounting, it is justified in claiming deductions for surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax payable in the financial year, subject to section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim, referencing judgments like Kedarnath Jurte Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. CIT and CIT vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.

2. Disallowance of Laboratory Expenses:

The second issue concerns the disallowance of laboratory expenses. The assessee had contributed to the Government Chemical Examiners Laboratories for modernizing their equipment to avoid delays in chemical analysis of liquor products, which affected its business. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, categorizing them as capital in nature, and the CIT(A) upheld this decision, noting that the assets were not owned by the assessee.

The assessee argued that these payments were made for business purposes and should be considered revenue expenses since the assessee did not own the equipment. The assessee cited the Delhi High Court judgment in CIT vs. D.T.T.D.C. Ltd., where similar expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.

The Tribunal, however, disagreed with the assessee, stating that the expenses must be wholly and exclusively for business purposes to be deductible. The Tribunal noted that the nexus of expenditure with business alone is insufficient; the expenses must directly contribute to earning profits. The Tribunal did not follow the Delhi High Court judgment due to a pending special leave petition in the Supreme Court and decided this issue against the assessee.

Conclusion:

The appeal regarding the disallowance of surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax (I.T.A. No. 65/Coch/2014) was allowed, recognizing these as allowable business expenses. However, the appeal concerning laboratory expenses (I.T.A. No. 66/Coch/2014) was partly allowed, upholding the disallowance of these expenses as capital in nature.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates