Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (12) TMI 1534 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a company. Settlement between parties leading to withdrawal of the application. Clarification sought from the Adjudicating Authority regarding withdrawal. Direction to pass appropriate order in line with the Supreme Court decision.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an appeal filed by one of the Directors against the order of the Adjudicating Authority admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a company. Initially, the Appellant expressed intent to settle the matter with the Operational Creditors, and as the Committee of Creditors had not been constituted, time was granted for settlement.

Subsequently, it was informed that the parties had reached a settlement, and an application for withdrawal was filed before the Interim Resolution Professional. The Professional sought clarification from the Adjudicating Authority, which was provided through an order clarifying the withdrawal. In light of these developments, the Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to pass an appropriate order in accordance with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors., 2019 SCC Online SC 73, while considering other relevant factors, including any claims made by other parties.

Ultimately, the appeal was disposed of with the aforementioned direction, and no costs were awarded in the matter. The judgment underscores the importance of settlement between parties in insolvency proceedings and the need for adherence to legal precedents set by higher courts in such matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates