Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2016 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (4) TMI 90 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
1. Rejection of product approval application
2. Interpretation of Indian Food Code regarding alcoholic beverages
3. Compliance with Food Safety and Standards Regulations
4. Alcoholic content in the beverage
5. Consideration under Clause 14(2) of the Indian Food Code

Analysis:

1. The petitioner applied for a license and subsequently for product approval for a non-alcoholic beverage imported under the Carl Jung Brand. The request for approval was rejected, citing the need for compliance with regulations. The validity of the rejection was questioned due to the previous striking down of the product approval and Screening Committee by the Apex Court.

2. The petitioner's counsel argued for an alternative submission under Clause 14(2) of the Indian Food Code, which categorizes alcoholic and alcohol-free beverages together. It was contended that the petitioner's beverage could fall under this category, seeking consideration under the said clause.

3. The respondents' counsel argued that the petitioner's request did not conform to the standards set by Regulation 2.10.6 of the Food Safety and Standards Regulations, emphasizing the non-alcoholic nature of the case. The documents submitted indicated a minimal alcoholic content of 0.14% by value.

4. The court directed the petitioner to apply to the first respondent for consideration under Clause 14(2) of the Indian Food Code, providing relevant materials and a scientific report. The petitioner could assert that the alcoholic content is less than 1%, and the authority was instructed to review the application within six weeks of receiving a copy of the court's order.

5. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, granting the petitioner the opportunity to seek consideration under the specific clause of the Indian Food Code. The judgment emphasized the need for compliance with regulations and the submission of necessary documentation for the review process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates