Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (4) TMI 733 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A
2. Treatment of capital gain as income from business

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 14A
The appellant challenged the disallowance under section 14A made by the Assessing Officer, which was confirmed by the CIT(A) to the extent of Rs. 10,000. The appellant contended that the disallowance was erroneous.

Issue 2: Treatment of capital gain as income from business
The Assessing Officer treated the short term and long term capital gain from the sale of shares as business income. The appellant argued that the income from the sale of shares should be taxed as capital gains, not as business income, citing past favorable decisions. The CIT(A) upheld the treatment of capital gain as business income, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal analyzed the financial data of the appellant, noting the increase in investments in shares over the years while business turnover decreased significantly. The Tribunal observed a shift in net profit from business activities to investment income, indicating a change in the nature of income. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider facts and figures from financial statements rather than past decisions as benchmarks.

The Tribunal criticized the CIT(A) for issuing a non-speaking order, highlighting the lack of evidence filed by the appellant and the absence of analysis from the available assessment records. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the issue related to the treatment of income from the sale of shares as capital gain/business income, instructing the appellant to provide relevant details to the CIT(A) for a comprehensive review.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of a well-reasoned and evidence-based decision-making process in tax matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates