Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2017 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (4) TMI 18 - AT - Customs


Issues: Classification of imported Linden Wood Slats under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 4421.90 or CTH 4408.90.

In this judgment, the appellants had imported Linden Wood Slats for the manufacture of wooden pencils, claiming classification under CTH 4421.90 and CETH 4410.90. However, the adjudicating authority classified the slats under CTH 4408.90 and CET 4404.90, attracting different duties. The main issue was whether the wood slats should be classified as Articles of Wood under CTH 4421.90 as claimed by the appellants or under CTH 4408.90 as held by the lower authorities.

The appellants argued that the wood slats were specifically processed for manufacturing wooden pencils, supported by a certificate from the overseas supplier. They referred to trade classifications and a judgment in a related case to support their claim. The Department contended that the products did not meet the criteria to be classified as pencil slats and referred to previous tribunal judgments to explain the manufacturing process required for pencil slats.

The Tribunal analyzed the submissions and records, noting that the disputed wood slats were not in sheet form but were specifically cut for manufacturing wooden pencils. They found that the lower authorities' classification under CTH 4408.90, which covers veneer sheets and wood sawn length-wise, did not apply to the wooden slats used for pencils. The Tribunal also highlighted the specific entry for Pencil Slats under Tariff Item 4421 90 40, aligning with the appellants' classification claim. They concluded that the wood slats were correctly classifiable under CTH 4421.90 as Articles of Wood for the exclusive use in manufacturing wooden pencils.

Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders and providing consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment was pronounced on 18-10-2016 by the Tribunal members M.V. Ravindran and Raju.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates