Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2017 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (4) TMI 850 - HC - Central Excise


Issues:
Challenge to order dated 07.10.2016 - rejection of appeal due to lack of evidence on depreciation claimed on capital goods.

Analysis:
1. The High Court observed that the Tribunal had rejected the appeal solely on the ground that the appellant had not provided evidence to substantiate the reversal of depreciation claimed on capital goods, as required by Rule 4(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004.

2. Both counsels agreed that the assessment was conducted under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the only evidence that could have been presented in such a situation was a copy of the return with the necessary receipt, which was indeed submitted to the Tribunal.

3. The Court noted that the Revenue counsel did not dispute the submission of this evidence. Therefore, it was unanimously agreed that the Tribunal's judgment needed to be set aside for a decision on the merits of the case.

4. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's judgment and directed it to reconsider the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the importance of a decision based on the evidence presented.

5. The Court allowed the appeal, resulting in the closure of the pending miscellaneous petition, with no specific order regarding costs. The decision aimed to ensure a fair assessment based on the evidence provided and the legal requirements under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates