2017 (12) TMI 963 - AT - Service Tax

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - it was alleged that assesse have not paid the service tax on the entire value of taxable services received and also have suppressed/short declared the value of taxable service - Held that - Commissioner (A) has not imposed any penalty u/s 78 of FA 1994 on the ground that the assesse has been filing the return periodically and identical issue pertaining to earlier year the appeal of the assessee is pending - penalty was rightly not imposed as there was no suppression - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
- Imposition of penalty under section 78 of Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Commissioner (A) where no penalty was imposed on the respondent under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The case involved the leasing out of land, building, and machinery by the assessee without paying the service tax on the entire value of taxable services received. The department issued show cause notices covering multiple periods, and penalties were imposed under sections 77(2) and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Commissioner refrained from imposing a penalty under section 78. The appellant contended that the non-imposition of penalty under section 78 was not sustainable, alleging suppression of material facts to evade tax.

Upon review, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner's decision not to impose a penalty under section 78. The Commissioner's reasoning was based on the assessee's periodic filing of returns and the pendency of an appeal on a similar issue from an earlier year. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that there was no suppression of facts, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 17/11/2017 by S.S Garg, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore.