9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (1) TMI 425 - AAR - GSTRate of tax - applicability of clause 3(v)(a) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017 - Works Contract - construction, erection, commissioning or installation of original works pertaining to railways - rate of GST@ 12% or 18%? - HELD THAT - The applicant has been awarded the Contract by M/s Rites Limited, which is a Public Sector Undertaking. Said contract was awarded for execution of works of laying of track as per layout plan, pavement along the track, construction of Admin building, Warehouse, Electrical works and Fire-fighting works etc. at Khodiyar, Gandhinagar, Gujarat. Further, contract is involving both supply of goods and services and is a composite supply in the nature of Works Contract Supply - The work awarded to the applicant comprises of laying of track as per layout plan, pavement along the track, construction of Admin building, Warehouse, Electrical works and Fire-fighting works etc. at Khodiyar, Gandhinagar, Gujarat. These works are in the nature of new works to be executed. These also involve construction of original works . As such, same are covered under the definition of original work , as defined inclause (zs) of the Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017. The Applicant has produced no evidence that the work was allotted to M/s RITES Ltd was pertaining to railways as defined at Section 2(31) of the Railway Act, 1989. There is also no evidence on record whether the work has been awarded in respect of Government railway or Non-Governmental railway . Although, the applicant has sought to infer that the said work was in respect of railways owned by Ministry of Railways, but he has not provided any supporting evidence in the form of agreement between M/s RITES Ltd and Ministry of Railways to establish the same. Therefore, in absence of any such conclusive proof that the work pertains to railways, the third condition is not satisfied. The contract work is not covered under clause no. 3(v)(a) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the work awarded can be covered under the definition of Works Contract as defined under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017. 2. Whether the said work can be considered as 'original work' as mentioned in clause 3(v)(a) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017. 3. Whether the said work can be considered as works contract pertaining to railways including monorail and metro. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Definition of Works Contract The applicant argued that the work awarded to them involves construction in relation to immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods is involved. This aligns with the definition of 'Works Contract' under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017, which includes building, construction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration, or commissioning of any immovable property. Therefore, the work awarded to the applicant is covered under the definition of 'Works Contract'. Issue 2: Consideration as 'Original Work' The term 'original works' as per clause (zs) of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017 includes all new constructions, all types of additions and alterations to abandoned or damaged structures on land that are required to make them workable, and erection, commissioning, or installation of plant, machinery, or equipment or structures. The applicant's scope of work, which includes laying of track work, pavement, construction of admin building, warehouse, and electrical/fire-fighting works, falls under 'new constructions' and thus qualifies as 'original work'. Issue 3: Pertaining to Railways The primary contention was whether the work pertains to railways. The applicant cited that the work was awarded by M/s RITES Ltd., a Public Sector Undertaking owned by the Ministry of Railways, Government of India, and thus should be considered as pertaining to railways. However, the term 'railways' as per Section 2(31) of the Railway Act, 1989 includes various components related to public carriage of passengers or goods. The applicant failed to provide conclusive proof that the work pertains specifically to railways as defined under Section 2(31) of the Railway Act, 1989. No evidence was presented to establish that the work was in respect of 'Government railway' or 'Non-Governmental railway'. Therefore, the third condition was not satisfied. Conclusion: The ruling concluded that while the contract qualifies as a 'Works Contract' and involves 'original works', it does not conclusively pertain to railways due to lack of evidence. Thus, the contract work is not covered under clause 3(v)(a) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017, and the applicable GST rate remains 18% instead of the reduced rate of 12%. Ruling: The contract work is not covered under clause 3(v)(a) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017, and therefore, the applicable GST rate is 18%.
|
