Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2021 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 1027 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Sanction of the Scheme of Merger by Absorption.
2. Compliance with statutory requirements and guidelines.
3. Observations and objections by the Regional Director.
4. Undertakings and clarifications by the Petitioners.
5. Approval of the Scheme and its implications.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Sanction of the Scheme of Merger by Absorption:
The petitioners sought the Tribunal's sanction for a Scheme of Merger by Absorption under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme involved the merger of Danta Enterprises Private Limited (Transferor Company 1) and Glebe Trading Private Limited (Transferor Company 2) with Siddeshwari Tradex Private Limited (Transferee Company). The Scheme was approved by the Board of Directors of the respective companies on 5th February 2019. The rationale for the Scheme included simplifying the group structure, reducing overheads, and enabling the group to leverage combined assets for raising funds and attracting investments.

2. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Guidelines:
The Regional Director, North-Western Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Ahmedabad, filed a report highlighting the need for compliance with Section 232(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding the payment of fees on enhanced authorized capital. The Regional Director also raised concerns about compliance with FEMA and RBI guidelines due to the presence of foreign shareholders in the petitioner companies. The statutory auditors emphasized the need for the amalgamated company to register as a "Core Investment Company" with the RBI under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934.

3. Observations and Objections by the Regional Director:
The Regional Director's report included several observations:
- The capital clause of the transferee company needed to be amended, and the difference in fees for the enhanced authorized capital had to be paid.
- Compliance with FEMA and RBI guidelines regarding foreign shareholders was necessary.
- The statutory auditors' emphasis on the need for registration as a "Core Investment Company" with the RBI.

4. Undertakings and Clarifications by the Petitioners:
In response to the Regional Director's report, the petitioners filed affidavits and provided the following undertakings:
- The transferee company would comply with Section 232(3)(i) and pay the required fees for the enhanced authorized capital.
- The transferee company would comply with FEMA and RBI guidelines concerning foreign shareholders.
- The transferee company would apply for registration as a "Core Investment Company" with the RBI upon the Scheme's implementation.

5. Approval of the Scheme and its Implications:
The Tribunal found the Scheme to be fair, reasonable, and not violative of any law or public policy. Consequently, the Scheme was sanctioned under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal's order included several provisions:
- The Transferor Companies were dissolved without winding-up.
- All property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties of the Transferor Companies were transferred to the Transferee Company.
- Pending legal proceedings involving the Transferor Companies would continue with the Transferee Company.
- Employees of the Transferor Companies would become employees of the Transferee Company without any break in service.
- Compliance with FEMA and RBI guidelines was mandated.
- The Transferee Company was required to apply for registration as a "Core Investment Company" with the RBI.

The Tribunal clarified that the order did not exempt the companies from paying any applicable stamp duty, taxes, or other charges. The petitioners were directed to deliver a certified copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies for registration within thirty days. The case was disposed of with no order as to costs, and urgent certified copies of the order were made available upon request.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates