Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2022 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (3) TMI 745 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
Challenge to rejection of appeal for failure to produce original demand notice along with appeal memorandum under Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Rejection of Appeal for Failure to Produce Original Demand Notice
The petitioner challenged the order of the 2nd respondent, Ext.P6, which rejected the appeal due to the petitioner's failure to cure defects, specifically the non-production of the original demand notice along with the appeal memorandum. The petitioner contended that the original assessment order and demand notice were not served on him as he was out of the country during that period. The Government Pleader argued that both the original assessment order and demand notice were issued to the petitioner but returned with the endorsement "not known."

Issue 2: Service of Documents and Appeal Filing
The High Court found that the original assessment order had indeed returned to the sender with the endorsement "not known," indicating that the petitioner was not served with the original order or demand notice initially. Although a certified copy of the assessment order was later issued to the petitioner, there was no evidence to show that the petitioner was served with the original or certified copy of the demand notice. The petitioner had applied for a certified copy of the demand notice, but no response had been provided by the assessing officer.

Issue 3: Legal Conclusion and Judgment
Considering the circumstances and lack of proof of service of the demand notice, the Court held that the rejection of the appeal for failing to produce the original demand notice was incorrect and against the law. The Court set aside Ext.P6 and directed the 1st respondent to provide the certified copy of the demand notice attached with the assessment order within ten days. Once received, the petitioner was instructed to produce the certified copy before the 2nd respondent within two weeks for a reconsideration of the appeal on its merits in a time-bound manner.

In conclusion, the High Court allowed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of proper service of documents and the petitioner's right to be issued with a certified copy of the demand notice for a fair consideration of the appeal under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates