Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2022 (3) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (3) TMI 1301 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the services provided by the appellant to AMSL.
2. Determination of whether the services constitute a composite supply or a mixed supply.
3. Applicability of exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Services:
The appellant, engaged in providing hospitality services to AMSL, sought clarification on the applicable GST SAC code and rate for their services. The original authority had differing views on the classification:
- SGST Member's View: The services were classified as "business support services" under SAC Code 998599, taxable at 9% CGST and 9% SGST. The SGST Member argued that the appellant was merely supporting AMSL in implementing the DDU-GKY project, and hence, the services were classified under "other support services."
- CGST Member's View: The CGST Member disagreed, stating that the appellant provided hospitality services, including boarding and lodging, directly to AMSL. The services were not just supportive but were part of a composite supply of hospitality services, classifiable under SAC 9963.

2. Composite Supply vs. Mixed Supply:
- SGST Member's View: The SGST Member did not explicitly address whether the services were a composite or mixed supply, focusing instead on the classification under business support services.
- CGST Member's View: The CGST Member considered the services a composite supply, where the provision of accommodation was the principal supply. The services were naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction, making them a composite supply under GST law.

3. Applicability of Exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate):
- SGST Member's View: The SGST Member did not address the exemption applicability due to the classification under business support services.
- CGST Member's View: The CGST Member opined that the composite supply of hospitality services, with accommodation as the principal supply, qualified for exemption under SI.No. 14 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate), as the per day equivalent tariff was below ?1000.

Appellate Authority's Decision:
The Appellate Authority analyzed the submissions and agreements between the appellant and AMSL, concluding as follows:
- The appellant provided hospitality services independently and not as an intermediary or agent of AMSL.
- The services constituted a composite supply with the provision of accommodation as the principal supply.
- The per day equivalent tariff for the accommodation was below ?1000, making the services eligible for exemption under SI.No. 14 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate).

Ruling:
a. The supply envisaged in the agreement with AMSL is a composite supply with "Provision of Accommodation-SAC 9963" as the principal supply.
b. The exemption at SI.No. 14 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is applicable to the case in hand.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates