2022 (10) TMI 1113 - AT - Income Tax

Rectification order u/s 154 - Addition is made as other income while computing allowable remuneration - HELD THAT - Remuneration of partners upon which the rectification order was passed thereby making addition, is related to the partners remuneration and the same is taxable in the hands of the partners for income from other sources and not in the hands of the partnership firm i.e. assessee firm herein. The delay before the CIT(A) was also explained by the assessee as the assessee did not receive the assessment order and received the recovery notice of outstanding demand. In fact, the CIT(A) has not taken into account whether the rectification order was received by the assessee or not and did not give any finding as to the service of the rectification order. Thus, the CIT(A) was not right in dismissing the appeal. Besides this before us, AR has explained the case on merit and from the merit of the case it appears that the assessee has explained all the details related to the business expenses and the same are incurred during the business of the assessee firm. Therefore, the rectification order passed by the AO is not just and proper. Hence, appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Issues:
1. Delay in serving the rectification order for A.Y. 2010-11
2. Consideration of submissions and evidence by CIT(A)
3. Granting another opportunity of being heard
4. Validity of rectification under Section 154
5. Addition of remuneration as other income
6. Tax effect on partners due to disallowed remuneration
7. Permission to amend grounds of appeal

Issue 1: Delay in serving the rectification order for A.Y. 2010-11

The appellant contested the delay in serving the rectification order for A.Y. 2010-11, stating that it was not received until approached for a refund. An affidavit was presented to support this claim, emphasizing no delay on the appellant's part. The appellant requested the appeal to be considered within time, highlighting the lack of inaction or delay on their part.

Issue 2: Consideration of submissions and evidence by CIT(A)

The appellant argued that the CIT(A) failed to fully consider the submissions and evidence presented regarding the impugned additions and the receipt of the rectification order. It was contended that the appellant's submissions were ignored, leading to an erroneous dismissal of the appeal.

Issue 3: Granting another opportunity of being heard

The appellant sought another opportunity to be heard, citing principles of natural justice and the lack of received orders as reasons for not filing the appeal initially. The appellant emphasized the proactive approach taken upon receiving the order, requesting fair consideration based on the circumstances.

Issue 4: Validity of rectification under Section 154

The appellant challenged the rectification order, arguing that it reflected a change of opinion rather than a valid rectification. It was contended that all necessary data were provided during the original assessment, and the rectification was deemed improper, requiring a revision order instead.

Issue 5: Addition of remuneration as other income

The appellant disputed the addition of various items as other income, contending that they were intricately linked to business operations and not standalone income sources. The appellant argued that the Assessing Officer incorrectly classified certain items as other income, leading to the disallowance of remuneration to partners.

Issue 6: Tax effect on partners due to disallowed remuneration

The appellant highlighted that partners paying tax at the maximum slab rate would neutralize the revenue impact if remuneration was disallowed at the firm level. It was emphasized that partners should receive suitable consideration if remuneration disallowance occurred, seeking fair treatment for tax implications.

Issue 7: Permission to amend grounds of appeal

The appellant requested permission to add, alter, or amend any other grounds of appeal before the final hearing, emphasizing the importance of flexibility in presenting arguments effectively. This request aimed to ensure comprehensive representation and consideration of all relevant aspects during the appeal process.

This detailed analysis covers the various issues raised in the legal judgment, providing a comprehensive overview of the arguments presented and the decision rendered by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad.

← Previous Next →