Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 493 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Determination of appropriate proportion of sum payable to AWS USA chargeable to tax for withholding tax purposes.
2. Examination of AWS USA's Permanent Establishment (PE) status in India.
3. Applicability of Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) to AWS USA.
4. Adequacy of information provided by AWS India for tax determination.
5. Dispute over the nature of payments made by AWS India to AWS USA.

Summary of Judgment:

1. Determination of Appropriate Proportion of Sum Payable:
The petitioners challenged the order dated 01.02.2023 by the Assessing Officer (AO) which disposed of AWS India's application under Section 195(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. AWS India sought a certificate for nil withholding of tax on reseller fees paid to AWS USA, arguing these payments were not chargeable to tax under the Act or the Indo-US DTAA and were subject to the Equalisation Levy under Section 165A of the Finance Act, 2016.

2. Examination of AWS USA's Permanent Establishment (PE) Status:
The AO concluded that AWS USA had significant infrastructural assets in India, constituting a PE, and thus its income was chargeable to tax. The AO based this on public domain information, assuming AWS USA owned and operated data centres in India. AWS India disputed this, claiming data centres were operated by independent entities on an arm's length basis.

3. Applicability of Indo-US DTAA:
The AO erroneously assumed that the Indo-US DTAA was inapplicable to AWS USA, considering it a Limited Liability Company (LLC) rather than an incorporated entity. The court found this assumption to be ex-facie erroneous, noting that AWS USA is indeed an incorporated entity and entitled to DTAA benefits.

4. Adequacy of Information Provided:
The court noted that AWS India had not provided AWS USA's financial information for preceding years, which was essential for determining the application under Section 195(2) of the Act. AWS India's claim that this information was available on the Department's portal was deemed insufficient.

5. Dispute Over Nature of Payments:
The AO's conclusion that reseller fees paid by AWS India to AWS USA were chargeable as business income under the Act was based on flawed assumptions. The AO failed to determine the proportion of income attributable to the PE as required by the Indo-US DTAA. The court found the AO's exercise of determining revenue attributable to a PE to be flawed and not in line with settled law.

Court's Decision:
The court suggested, and parties agreed, to withhold 10% of payments (less 2% Equalisation Levy already paid) as withholding tax without prejudice to their rights in the assessment proceedings. The impugned order was modified to require AWS India to withhold 8% of payments to AWS USA for the period from 01.11.2022 to 31.03.2023. The withheld tax must be deposited with the Revenue authorities within one week, constituting a full discharge of AWS India's obligation. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates