Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (12) TMI 547 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved:
The appeal challenges the final assessment order of the Assessing Officer dated 29.09.2019 u/s 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-17.

Management Support Services as Fees for Technical Services:
The assessee contested the characterization of the fee for management support services provided to a company as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Act and as per Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Tribunal previously ruled in favor of the assessee for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16, holding that such receipts are not FTS. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of services provided and concluded that the conditions of section 12(4)(b) were not met as the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, or know-how to the recipient independently. Consequently, it was held that the receipts were not in the nature of FTS. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant credit for TDS in accordance with the law.

TDS Credit and Interest Charges:
The Assessing Officer was directed to consider granting TDS credit amounting to Rs 9,74,418. Grounds related to charging interest u/s 234B and initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) were deemed premature and not adjudicated at that stage.

In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the characterization of management support services fees and directing the Assessing Officer to grant TDS credit. The issues of interest charges and penalty proceedings were considered premature and not addressed at that stage.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates