Eligibility of Explosives (Chapter 36) for exemption from duty under Notification No. 191/87-C.E. - Clarification - Regarding - Central Excise - 1/94-CX.3

Eligibility of Explosives (Chapter 36) for exemption from duty under Notification No. 191/87-C.E. - Clarification - Regarding Circular No. 1/94-CX.3 Dated 5-1-1994 [From F.No. 108/1/92-CX.3] Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Excise Customs, New Delhi Subject : Eligibility of Explosives (Chapter 36) for exemption from duty under Notification No. 191/87-C.E. - Clarification - Regarding. I am directed to say that doubts have been expressed as to whether explosives when used in blasting mines for the purpose of manufacture of copper, zinc or lead concentrates would be entitled for exemption under Notification No. 191/87-C.E., dated 4-8-1987. 2. In the matter C.C.E., Jaipur, relying on the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of M/s. J.K. Cotton Spinning Weaving Mills Company Limited v. S.T.O. [1965 SCR 900] had argued that explosives used for blasting of mines in the manufacture of copper, zinc or lead concentrates are entitled for the benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No. 191/87-C.E., dated 4-8-1987. 3. The matter has been examined. In this connection it is pointed out that Supreme Court in that case was interpreting the provisions of Sales Tax Laws relating to commodities covered by the expression which the registered dealer "may purchase when such goods are intended for use by him as raw material, processing materials, machinery, plant, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, fuel or lubricants in the manufacture of processing of goods for sale or in mining or in the generation or distribution of electricity or in other form of power." 4. The Supreme Court while interpreting the aforesaid entry had made certain observation relating to manufacture of goods in connection with manufacture or in relation to manufacture etc. to give effect to the statutory provisions. This interpretation of the law cannot be made applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case as : (i) The law relating to excise on manufacture is distinct and different. (ii) The terms in or in relation to the manufacture of goods stand interpreted with reference to the case of Empire Industry, Ujagar Prints etc., and (iii) Excise is in relation to factory. 5. Therefore it is clarified that the explosives which are not used in or in relation to manufacture of Copper, Zinc or Lead concentrates etc. in the "factory" will not be entitled for the concession under Notification No. 191/87-C.E., dated 4-8-1987. The expression "factory" shall have the same meaning as given in Section 2(e) of the Central Excises Salt Act, 1944. 6. All pending assessments may be finalised on the above basis. Lower field formations may be advised suitably. The trade may also be informed according