Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Excess Payment of Service Tax, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 110178
Dated: 13-4-2016
By:- RAJENDRA KHOMNE

Excess Payment of Service Tax


  • Contents

Sir,

Good Morning,

For year end, Service Tax Due date is 31st March. But some party's bill not come before 31st March, hence we paid service tax approximately. After all bills booking we find that we have paid service tax excess in some services & short in some services. My query is can we adjust excess service tax for short payment. (For Example. for Advocate Service we have paid ₹ 2800/- Short & for Manpower we have paid ₹ 2800/- Excess)

And other query is if we paid excess service tax can we adjust it for next month payment.

Sir, Pl Guide

Thanks,

Khomne R. M.

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 10 of 10 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 13-4-2016
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir,

Rule 6 (4A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 states that " Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (4), where an assessee has paid to the credit of Central Government any amount in excess of the amount required to be paid towards service tax liability for a month or quarter, as the case may be, the assessee may adjust such excess amount paid by him against his service tax liability for the succeeding month or quarter, as the case may be.

Therefore you can adjust tax paid in excess during a particular month against tax payable for subsequent month. Adjustment of tax paid in excess against tax short paid is not permissible under law. Where you have short paid the tax you have to pay the difference with interest. Tax paid in excess can be claimed as refund subject to doctrine of unjust enrichment.


2 Dated: 13-4-2016
By:- MUKUND THAKKAR

Nicely explain by Rajagopalan Ranganathan sir, I am agree with your view.


3 Dated: 13-4-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Sir if the tax codes are for statistical purpose only, then the service tax paid in excess under one service category should not be denied to the assesse to be adjusted against laibility payable for another service. Please discuss.


4 Dated: 14-4-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

Really Very Very Intelligent cross question by you.Thought provoking. With the omission Section 65 and 65A, no legal force in old accounting codes. So there should be no problem in adjustment of amount of ST paid in excess. You are totally on right track. At the same time I am very eager to know the views of Sh.Rajagopalan Ranganathan Sir and Sh.Mukund Thakkar, Sir.

No assessee should suffer for procedural lapses, especially, in view of the fact that rate of interest is different for delayed refund and recovery of short levy/payment.


5 Dated: 14-4-2016
By:- surya narayana

One can also recollect that the CBEC from 1.7.2012 introduced only 3 or 4 accounting codes for Service Tax, Edu. Cess, and SHE Cess, interest and penalty.

Latter, they have advised to use all the earlier codes ( service wise0. While saying/advising it was clearly said that the re-introduction of the old codes are only for the statistical purposes and not other wise.

Best Regards

Suryanarayana


6 Dated: 14-4-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Thanks Sri Kasturi Sir and Sri Surya Sir for backing my contention. Thanks.


7 Dated: 14-4-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Dear Sirs,

In this way we learn from each other.


8 Dated: 16-4-2016
By:- MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN

The views of Sri Rajagopalan Sir is correct in one way. But we have to consider them discussions of Shri Ganeshan and Shri Suryanarayana. Otherwise the classification of service again will come and the problems will arise again. But we don't know the stand of department in this regard.


9 Dated: 17-4-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Sir we should take up this issue with the department at the right time and in the right forum. It will solve problems of N number of assesses who are also facing such issues and who also would like to seek a clarify in this regard. Thanks.


10 Dated: 17-4-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

There is no harm in raising the issue before the department. But I am still of the view that old (erstwhile) accounting codes without any statutory provisions are just for easing the understanding of any service for proper classification only. Just for convenience of assessees. These have become, "PRIVATE" like non-statutory Cenvat records i.e. RG. 23 A Pt.I & II, RG 23C Part I. & II. I do not challenge the Rule quoted by Sh.Ranganathan, Sir. But practically, in absence of statutory provisions regarding accounting code (old), excess amount/short amount of ST can be adjusted without applying for refund of excess paid.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates