Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

IN BANKING JEWEL LOAN - APPRAISER FEE RELATED, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 115628
Dated: 6-11-2019
By:- VEL MURUGAN

IN BANKING JEWEL LOAN - APPRAISER FEE RELATED


  • Contents

SIR

IM WORKING AS A GOLD APPRAISER IN TAMILNADU STATE APEX CO-OPERATIVE BANK

MY WORK IS COMMISSION BASIS

BANK COLLECT APPRAISER CHARGES FROM CUSTOMERS.

THAT CHARGES( APPRAISER FEE) IS TAXABLE UNDER GST OR NOT

FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS THEY COLLECT GST.

THAT IS CORRECT OR NOT

ANOTHER ? ON MY SERVICE IS TAXABLE UNDER GST OR NOT

BANK COLLECT ₹ 100( INCLUDE GST) FROM CUSTOMER THEN MY SHARE 80% BANK SHARE 20%

BUT I RECEIVED ONLY 67% . THIS IS CORRECT OR NOT

PLEASE REPLY FOR MY PROBLEM

THANK YOU SIR

G VELMURUGAN

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 8-11-2019
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The bank is not on right track. Suppose you are 'A' (Service Provider), Bank is service receiver as 'B' and ultimate consumer is 'C'. C is B's customer and not A's. A has nothing to do with C. C is your customer's customer. B is playing the role of intermediary.

Since A is supplying service to B, A is to collect GST from B and deposit with the Govt. It is A's duty and here the situation reverse. Why B is making payment to you after deduction of GST ? It is not TDS or TCS. An amount of ₹ 80/- includes GST and you get ₹ 67/- after deduction of GST of ₹ 13/- (@18%). Your service is taxable. You can avail threshold exemption of ₹ 20 lakhs.

Also go through the following case law pertaining to Service Tax regime.

2008 (12) S.T.R. 376 (Tri. - Chennai) = 2008 (7) TMI 147 - CESTAT, CHENNAI PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., TRICHY


2 Dated: 8-11-2019
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The amount received from the bank should not be called 'commission'.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates